Jobs to Developers: please come back!

by Bob Walsh on October 17, 2007 · 5 comments

in Admin

Posted 5 minutes ago at Apple hotnews by Steve Jobs:

Let me just say it: We want native third party applications on the iPhone, and we plan to have an SDK in developers’ hands in February. We are excited about creating a vibrant third party developer community around the iPhone and enabling hundreds of new applications for our users. With our revolutionary multi-touch interface, powerful hardware and advanced software architecture, we believe we have created the best mobile platform ever for developers.

So why the turnaround from just a few months ago? Why go from you can develop in Safari and that’s it to please, please develop native apps?

Two words: Customer Demand.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • Digg
  • Posterous
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • HackerNews
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • MSN Reporter

{ 5 comments }

1 Jaysoft October 18, 2007 at 3:02 am

I think this is great news, although it does raise the issue of virus and trojan activity. I don’t know anything about the architecture of the iPhone, but I assume it is not safe to say that it is secure. This much is obvious already, when you look at how many hacks are available already.

I guess the first native application we’ll all buy is some kind of anti-virus suite.

In the UK, the iPhone isn’t available for a few more weeks, but I’m going to get one when it launches here.

2 Jay October 19, 2007 at 3:45 pm

You’re kidding right? I think you’ve fallen prey to the blatantly anti-Apple propaganda that windows advocates have been shoveling out far and wide since the day the iPhone was announced.

Clearly Apple has long planned to release a phone SDK since the very first day they announced the phone.

The reason they didnt’ announce it then is because the iPhone is running Leopard… it depends on key Leapard functionality (such as core animation / layerkit) and there’s no point in announcing an SDK that you cant’ ship right away because the underlying operating system is still in development.

The whole idea that Apple wasn’t going to give an iPhone SDK is purely the imagination of desperate apple bashers who have been coming up with all kinds of reasons to bash this product since it was announced– including the claim that it was too expensive, then the claim that it was desperation that caused apple to drop the price, then the claim that apple really screwed over its customers by dropping the price, etc. etc.

The Safari platform was already there. The iPhone SDK is going to obviously take more time. Its only the shrill screaming from desperate microsoft sycophants that has caused apple to pre-announce the SDK. Normally, Apple would have just announced it at MacWorld in January– obvioulsy that was the plan given the february ship time.

So the change is, they’ve started bending to the screaming from the uninformed apple bashers, and that’s not a good thing.

3 Bob Walsh October 19, 2007 at 5:04 pm

“The whole idea that Apple wasn’t going to give an iPhone SDK is purely the imagination of desperate apple bashers”

uh, no.

Didn’t Steve Jobs say there that there was not going to be an SDK a few months ago? And as for “the shrill screaming from desperate microsoft sycophants”, that’s music to the ears of Apple; Customers wanting something Apple (publicly) was not prepared to give them, was not.

is “shrill screaming from desperate microsoft sycophants” on iTunes yet? I want it! :)

4 Joe October 21, 2007 at 11:21 am

No, Apple never said there would never be an Phoen SDK.

That’s just propaganda from Apple bashers.

5 Bob Walsh October 21, 2007 at 12:57 pm

Joe – When the iPhone was announced, Jobs said that third party apps would be limited to Safari and there would be no SDK. His words, not mine. (I went digging for the original text of the intro; closest I found was: http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/fast-and-furious/no-iphone-sdk-means-no-iphone-killer-apps-267899.php)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: